Phys.org  March 8, 2024
Scientists are enthusiastically imagining ways in which artificial intelligence (AI) tools might improve research. A team of researchers in the US (Yale University, Princeton University) developed a taxonomy of scientists’ visions for AI, observing that their appeal comes from promises to improve productivity and objectivity by overcoming human shortcomings. But proposed AI solutions can also exploit our cognitive limitations, making us vulnerable to illusions of understanding in which we believe we understand more about the world than we actually do. Such illusions obscure the scientific community’s ability to see the formation of scientific monocultures, in which some types of methods, questions and viewpoints come to dominate alternative approaches, making science less innovative and more vulnerable to errors. The proliferation of AI tools in science risks introducing a phase of scientific enquiry in which we produce more but understand less. By analysing the appeal of these tools, they provided a framework for advancing discussions of responsible knowledge production in the age of AI… read more. TECHNICAL ARTICLE
Illusions of understanding in AI-driven scientific research. Credit: Nature volume 627, pages 49–58 (2024)   Â