When talking to clients and colleagues the term "disruptive innovation" will often be used. Â In fact, this is popular enough that it appears in government solicitations. Â Since the term was originated by Clayton Christensen several years ago, it has taken on a variety of different meanings. Â It is certainly overused, but I often wonder if it is being misused. Â It is important to recognize that the term comes directly from Christensen's Disruptive Innovation Theory. Â And although it has since strayed from this specific definition, it is important to keep its past in mind.
Here is the original definition from Christensen:
"A disruptive innovation is not a breakthrough innovation that makes good products a lot better. Â But it has a very specific definition. Â And that is it transforms a product that historically was so expensive and complicated that only a few people with a lot of money and a lot of skill had access to it. Â A disruptive innovation makes it so much more affordable and accessible that a much larger population have access to it." Â (Clayton Christensen)
In this short video Christensen describes his theory and a few case examples:
Â